Frequently Asked Questions
In Sri Lanka, copyright protection arises automatically upon the creation and fixation of an original work in a tangible medium of expression. There is no system of copyright registration in Sri Lanka, unlike in some other jurisdictions.
Accordingly, authors and creators should maintain reliable evidence of authorship such as dated drafts, publication records or other documentation to support any future claims of ownership or infringement. Maintaining such records serves as the primary means of proving authorship and ownership since no formal registration process exists.
The term of copyright protection in Sri Lanka extends for the lifetime of the author plus seventy (70) years after their death.
In the case of joint authorship, the copyright term is calculated from the date of death of the last surviving co-author. Upon the expiration of this statutory term, the work enters the public domain. It may be used freely by the public without the requirement of prior authorization or payment of royalties.
[Section 13 1PA 2003]
Yes. Under the Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003, copyright ownership may be held jointly.
This applies where two or more individuals have collaboratively created a work, unless a written agreement specifies otherwise. In the absence of a contrary arrangement, each co-author is generally presumed to hold an equal and undivided interest in the copyright, regardless of the proportion of their individual contribution. One of the notable features of joint ownership is the ability of each co-owner to independently license or assign their share of the rights. Following Section 18(1), copyright is transferable either wholly or partially.
Section 18(2) IPA stipulates that any such assignment or license must be executed in writing and signed by the transferor to be legally effective.
User-generated content—such as videos, blogs, social media posts, digital artwork, and similar creative works—may qualify for copyright protection under Sri Lankan law, provided it satisfies the statutory requirements of originality and fixation.
Copyright subsists in original literary and artistic works, including but not limited to writings, computer programs, musical compositions, audiovisual works, drawings, paintings, architectural designs, sculptures, engravings, lithographs, and photographs. This broad classification encompasses most forms of content commonly created and distributed on digital platforms. [Section 6 IPA 2003]
However, where user-generated content incorporates third-party copyrighted material, the creator must obtain the necessary licenses or authorizations to avoid infringement. It is imperative for creators to be vigilant regarding third-party intellectual property rights and to ensure full compliance with the applicable legal provisions when using or referencing external content.
Performing or distributing a cover version of a copyrighted song – whether on a public platform/ channel or at a public event- generally requires obtaining prior authorization by way of a license from the copyright owner.
A cover song typically involves the adaptation and public performance of a musical composition, and specifically, in the case of YouTube videos or any online platform, it further constitutes communication to the public. Such acts fall within the scope of exclusive rights protected by the Act, and performing them without valid authorization may result in copyright infringement under Section 22.
Concerning public performances such as those conducted at a pub, Section 3 of the Act defines “public performance” to include “the recitation, playing, dancing, acting or otherwise performing the work in public either directly or employing any device or process.” Therefore, even a live performance of a copyrighted song amounts to an act that requires licensing from the copyright holder(s).
It is important to ensure that the CMO is officially registered with the National Intellectual Property Office (NIPO) and operates with transparency in royalty collection and distribution. A CMO with a strong reputation, demonstrated accountability, and a track record of fair and clear contract terms is essential. CMO’s ability to manage rights both locally and internationally is critical.
When selecting a CMO in Sri Lanka, several key factors must be evaluated:
- It is essential to first ensure the CMO is registered with and regulated by the National Intellectual Property Office (NIPO) of Sri Lanka, confirming its legal status and compliance with national IP standards.
- Assess their credibility and track record among creators and rights holders to gauge reliability and effectiveness.
- Look for clear and detailed policies on royalty collection, distribution, and reporting to ensure accountability.
- Confirm whether the CMO has reciprocal agreements with foreign CMOs, enabling international royalty collection and broader protection.
- Understand the administrative fees charged by the CMO and how they impact your net royalty income.
- Verify which rights are covered (eg: public performance, mechanical reproduction, digital streaming) and whether they align with your needs.
- Check how often royalties are distributed and whether you’ll receive detailed earnings reports.
- Review the contract carefully, paying attention to clauses on exclusivity, duration, renewal and termination to ensure fair and flexible terms.
In Sri Lanka, performers are protected not by copyright itself but under related rights, as set out in Part II of the IP Act of 2003. These include the performer’s legal authority to control the fixation, reproduction, broadcasting, public communication, and distribution of their live or recorded performances.
The duration of protection is 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the performance was fixed or communicated to the public. Although they do not hold copyright in a traditional sense, these related rights provide them with significant legal and economic control over the use of their performances.
A patent is an exclusive legal right granted for a novel, inventive, and industrially applicable invention under Sri Lanka’s Intellectual Property Act of 2003.
The patent system incentivizes innovation by granting the inventor a time-limited exclusive right to exploit the invention, in exchange for the public disclosure of its technical specifications. This disclosure contributes to the advancement and dissemination of technological knowledge.
An invention is considered patentable provided it meets three core statutory requirements: novelty, inventive step, and industrial application as detailed in Sections 64-66 of the Act.
However, certain subject matter is excluded from patent protection, including scientific theories, mathematical methods, business methods, and medical or surgical procedures for the treatment of humans or animals. In addition, a patent application must comply with formal requirements under Section 62, including a clear and complete description, definitive claims, and drawings where applicable, sufficient to enable a person skilled in the art to replicate the invention.
A patent typically lasts for a period of 20 years from the date of filing.
To preserve the validity of a patent throughout its term, the patentee must pay the prescribed annual maintenance fees. Failure to do so may result in the lapse of the patent, causing it to fall into the public domain, as provided under Section 73 of the Act.
The rights conferred upon a patent holder include the exclusive authority to prevent third parties, without consent, from making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing the patented invention. These rights apply not only to patented products but also extend to products directly obtained through a patented process.
- The patent holder possesses the exclusive right to assign, license, or otherwise transfer ownership or interests in the patent, either wholly or partially. In instances of infringement, the patentee is entitled to initiate legal proceedings to enforce their rights, thereby ensuring legal protection and the ability to derive economic benefit throughout the duration of the patent term.
- Securing a patent confers a competitive advantage by legally precluding competitors from manufacturing, using, or commercializing the protected invention without authorization.
- Patent protection facilitates avenues for commercialization, including the ability to license the rights to third parties or assign the patent in exchange for financial consideration, thus generating potential revenue streams.
- Additionally, patents may enhance a company’s investment appeal by demonstrating proprietary innovation, thereby increasing investor confidence.
- Patents also contribute to strengthening a company’s market position, reinforcing brand credibility, and serving as tangible evidence of technological advancement and inventive capability.
The patent holder may transfer rights to another party through assignment, succession, or a license agreement. Such transfers may be effected either wholly or partially, allowing the licensee or assignee to exercise the rights conferred by the patent, subject to the terms of the agreement.
The transfer must be executed in writing and may be recorded with the National Intellectual Property Office (NIPO) to ensure legal validity and enforceability against third parties. This enables the patent holder to retain the right to receive royalties or other forms of consideration as stipulated in the assignment or license agreement.
Ownership of a patentable invention created in the course of employment is generally vested in the employer, unless otherwise agreed upon. However, where an invention is created outside the scope of employment and without use of the employer’s resources, the rights may remain with the employee-inventor.
A PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) application is an international patent application that enables an applicant to seek patent protection simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions through a single filing.
This is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which streamlines the initial filing process by providing an international search report and preliminary examination, assessing the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the invention. This does not result in the grant of an international patent but merely facilitates entry into the national or regional phase in contracting states, offering a unified procedure.
Filing a PCT application offers strategic and procedural advantages for inventors seeking international patent protection. The system offers a cost-effective, time-efficient, and legally recognized pathway to securing patent rights in multiple jurisdictions.
- It allows an applicant to preserve the priority date while deferring the cost and complexity of filing separate national applications in multiple countries.
- The International Search Report provides an early indication of the invention’s potential patentability, offering valuable insights that assist in evaluating commercial viability, attracting investor interest, and making informed decisions regarding national phase entry.
Yes, an applicant may initiate the patent process by filing a single international patent application under the PCT. This allows applicants to delay national filings for up to 30 or 31 months while maintaining the original priority date, providing additional time to assess the invention’s commercial potential and decide where to seek protection.
Utilizing the PCT system offers strategic advantages. It streamlines the initial process by deferring the need for multiple filings, thereby reducing upfront costs and administrative burden. Moreover, it provides applicants with valuable time—up to 30 or 31 months from the priority date—to evaluate the commercial viability of the invention in various jurisdictions before committing to the expense of national phase entries.
However, it is critical to understand that a PCT application does not result in the automatic grant of patent rights in any country. During the national phase, applicants must still file separate applications in each designated jurisdiction, where the invention will undergo substantive examination under the respective national patent laws. Patentability determinations are made independently by each national or regional patent office, which may ultimately grant or reject the application.
Yes, as a PCT member, Sri Lanka allows applicants to file international patent applications under the PCT system.
This allows Sri Lankan inventors to seek patent protection in over 150 countries through a single application, with the ability to claim priority from a national Sri Lankan patent application.
The novelty requirement stipulates that an invention must be new. It must not have been disclosed to the public in any form, anywhere in the world, before the filing or priority date of the application.
This includes prior publication, public use, sale, or any form of public disclosure. If the invention has already entered the public domain before the filing date, it will not satisfy the novelty criterion and will be ineligible for patent protection. Patents are granted only for inventions that are original and do not form part of the existing body of knowledge, also known as ‘prior art’.
- Ensure your invention is novel by conducting a prior Art search both locally and internationally.
- Keep the invention confidential until the application is filed to avoid public disclosure. Any non-confidential disclosure prior to filing may invalidate the patent due to a lack of novelty.
- Draft a detailed description of the invention, including claims, drawings (if applicable), and an abstract. A well-drafted specification is critical for enforceability and protection.
- Consult an IP attorney to ensure compliance with procedural and legal requirements under the Intellectual Property Act No.36 of 2003.
According to the Intellectual Property Act No. 36 of 2003, a “trademark” is defined as any visible sign that serves to distinguish the goods of one enterprise from those of another. [Section 101 IPA No.36 of 2003]
A trademark is an intellectual property consisting of a word, symbol, slogan, design, or a combination of these that identifies and distinguishes a good or service of one undertaking from another. Consumers are able to recognize these products in the marketplace and differentiate based on brand reputation.
While trademark registration is not mandatory in Sri Lanka, it is strongly recommended, particularly for businesses seeking to safeguard their brand identity and secure exclusive legal rights to their marks, products, or services.
Owners of unregistered marks may acquire limited rights under common law through the doctrine of passing off, which protects the goodwill associated with a mark against misrepresentation. However, enforcing rights through passing off can be legally complex and burdensome, as it involves a higher evidentiary burden. These challenges make common law remedies considerably less effective compared to statutory protection.
Registering a trademark grants the owner a range of exclusive rights to use the logo or brand name in connection with products or services, while preventing unauthorized use of the same or similar mark that may potentially create confusion among customers and damage reputation.
Registering a trademark offers several practical advantages:
- Exclusive rights to use the mark and legal protection against other parties for unauthorized use of the same or a confusingly similar mark
- A registered mark enhances brand identity, fosters consumer trust, and helps your business stand out. It serves as public notice of your rights, reducing the risk of bad-faith applications.
- Over time, a registered mark will gain a significant amount of commercial value, becoming a valuable business asset that can be licensed, sold, or franchised to support business growth.
- Registering provides statutory recognition of your ownership, enabling action against counterfeit goods, including through customs enforcement and online takedown mechanisms.
- This also offers long-term protection for an initial period of 10 years and can be renewed every 10 years indefinitely, ensuring lasting brand security.
Trademark registration will lapse if not renewed within the prescribed period. A six-month grace period is available for late renewal, subject to payment of a surcharge. Failure to renew within this period will result in the removal of the mark from the register, requiring a new application to regain protection.
If a trademark is not renewed before its expiry, it will lapse. Under Sri Lankan IP law, a six-month grace period is provided to renew the mark with a surcharge. Failure to do so will result in the removal of the mark from the register and the loss of exclusive rights, potentially allowing competitors to register identical or similar marks.
To regain protection, a fresh application must be filed, subject to the full registration process, including examination and publication. To avoid losing rights, it is strongly advised to monitor renewal deadlines and take timely action.
If your trademark is registered in Sri Lanka, your exclusive rights to the mark are generally limited to the jurisdiction of the country, as trademark protection is inherently territorial in nature.
If you intend to expand your business and extend your rights internationally, you will need to seek separate registrations in those jurisdictions directly.
To identify existing or conflicting marks, you should conduct a comprehensive trademark search by reviewing the National Intellectual Property Office (NIPO) database as well as publicly available sources. This includes checking registered business names, websites, and social media platforms, and domain name registrations to detect any prior or similar use that may affect your trademark’s registrability.
A formal search can identify any existing or pending trademarks that may be identical or similar to the proposed mark. Engaging a qualified intellectual property professional is recommended, as they can perform a skilled search and evaluate potential conflicts across relevant classes.
Provided it meets the necessary conditions for protection, a hashtag or handle may be registered as a trademark.
It must serve as a distinctive identifier capable of distinguishing your goods or services from those of others.
A generic or merely descriptive mark will not qualify for registration. It must be used in a commercial context as a recognizable brand element.
The registrability of AI-generated marks depends on their compliance with established legal criteria for trademark protection. The method of creation—whether by a human or artificial intelligence—does not, in itself, affect eligibility.
While the Act does not explicitly address AI-generated marks, the absence of human authorship does not preclude registration. The focus is on the mark’s ability to distinguish and its compliance with the statutory requirements. Therefore, if an AI-generated mark fulfills these criteria, it may be eligible for trademark registration in Sri Lanka.